Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: The Fate of Rumsfeld  (Read 3926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

"Ok, stop using 9/11 as the reason why everything's ok alright?"

Clearly 9/11 was a sign that everything wasn't ok.

"9/11 probably would have happened no matter who was president."

Yea, so?

"To say that everything changes after that, and we have to give bush a break is not a fair thing to ask for. tax credits and tax rebates helped the rich more than the poor-ie,"

You just need to shut your pie-hole.  I am poor.  The tax rebates helped me fine.

"But here's the real thing. Where did that money come from? the surplus? remember that?"

If there is one thing I'm known for, its my memory.  Its like a steel trap.  The surplus was fine, even with the cuts.  Then there was 9/11.  Remember that?

"come september 11th, it would have been nice to have that money wouldn't it?"

You are really being an iconoclast.  Boy, you just can't be pleased.  Want Bush to do something about the economy?  He was doing something about the economy.  Want Bush to be prepared for the event that no one out there was expecting?  He can either spend money to spur the economy or save it for an unexpected war.    He's d--ned if he does and if he don't in your book.   Arguments like this are why I left liberalism.

Its the same sort of tortured logic that insists we become less dependant on foreign oil but then fights tooth and nail against using our own oil (except, apparently, for what is in the emergency reserves.  These people kill me.)

"Ok... i don't understand where people spending money in the tech stocks and then losing out is Clinton's fault?"

Look closely.  I placed more blame on Greenspan.  I wished he was sacked.  I was merely contradicting your statement that this happened on Bush's watch, when it didn't.

"This says a lot... To someone who's not fully convinced that we should be involved in war right now, I'm not sure this arguement has any stock."

Not fully convinced we should be involved in war right now?  Me neither.   Too bad we didn't start it.   But really, I don't really care if you think we should end what someone else started.  All I care is that there are more of me than there are of you so we can make sure no weenies take office.

"Wartime economies are supposed to be good"

What?  Is that a law or something?  Or just a happy consequence.   This is quite irrelevant.   Do you know what the word 'cogent' means?  Its a word you want to be associated with your arguments.  Sadly, it isn't.

"If war is something that (you're saying) stresses the economy,"

Do you think there might be any significance to the fact that the first blow was an attack on the WORLD TRADE CENTER?   This was no ordinary stress, foo.

""But North Korea does. See the '80,000' in one crack thread where I have posted a news article that links Syria to North Korea.""

"That's right. North Korea is a threat to us. They have capabilities. notice we didn't start a pre-emptive war against them now did we?"

That's because its not NK thats the real threat.  NK is China's pin cushion.  Notice that we refused to engage NK in any dialogue until China was involved in it.  And someone said that the President was a unilateralist.  Guess that don't work.

Iraq, by all appearances, was an imminent threat.  And since its pretty certain that the VX gas that was almost used against Jordan came from Iraq, I think its safe to say that the UN was a stupid and worthless utterly foul smelling putrid peice of excrement for stalling long enough for Hussein to get his stuff into Syria before we invaded.    BTW, did you ever conclude your thoughts on how to deal with Syria?

"are you trying to justify Bush's sole focus on Star Wars before 9/11?"

Are you trying to be deliberately obtuse?  First you take Bush to task for focusing on a missle defense system, and then you take him to task for not focusing on NK.... which would prompt.... a missle defense system.  Such duplicity in a mere mortal.

"""The USA now has no credibility,"""

""Tell that to Libya.""

I noticed that you didn't delete that.  You forgot to, I'm sure.  You wanted to, I"m certain.   Libya gave up its WMD program because it learned that we had some goods on it and they knew they might very well be next....

"Did you consider him a War president when you cast your ballot in 1999?"

Of course not.   But Al Bore was so clearly a weenie.  There were others that I would of voted for, given the opportunity, but Bush was the man for the job.  Man, just thinking of a US with Bore in charge right now makes me shudder.  We probably would of collectively pulled our pants down and put a big red target on our gluteous maximus and be skewered right now right up the you know what.

"out of that 5000, how much was from the tax cuts and how much was just money back?"

Once again, you can't be pleased.  First you say "You weren't helped."  Then I show that I was helped.  Then you say, "Oh yea?  but....."   Stop morphing into one position after the other.  Stake your ground.  If you get pushed off of it, give it up.  Don't grovel.

"By tossing out the R^3,"

I don't know what that means.

"I'm expressing a feeling against what I've been indoctrinated to believe all my life at Lutheran Schools: Christians are Republicans, and Democrats are not."

Well, I was raised a democrat and a liberal from birth, even while in the Lutheran Schools.  I did not vote for the first Bush.   So, what am I reacting against?

You know, there is no real value in reacting just for reacting sake.  Its.... I dunno.... childish.

You'll grow out of it.  ;)
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

LPFanKabe

  • Predominant User
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 618
    • http://www.daenzer.org
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #21 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

Oh wait... Bush's tactic with real threats is debate now? China and NK? But with small threats like Iraq and Libya we use force, or implied force. I see....


By the way, Having the country being run by Bush makes me sick and scared k? Bore he was... and I'm not sure I would have liked to vote for him either.... but at least 'inventing the internet' is his only noticibly dumb comment..... Bush sounds like a moron. I want my president to be intelligent, I'm sorry. call me elitist, but a C average person who can't speak is not good enough. I'll vote accordingly.
Logged
Leitourgia Divina adiaphora non est!

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #22 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

"Oh wait... Bush's tactic with real threats is debate now? China and NK? But with small threats like Iraq and Libya we use force, or implied force. I see...."

I don't think you do see.  In fact, you seem to be blabbering.  Get ahold of yourself!

Libya proves that we are credible with those that matter.   You aren't suggesting we go to war with China, are you?  Because that's what attacking NK is all about.

BTW, I'm all for laying down the smack with China.  I just think you raise points because you think that they show some weakness in Bush, not because of some merit to the point.

"By the way, Having the country being run by Bush makes me sick and scared k?"

Buy a gun.  That's what I did.

"Bush sounds like a moron. I want my president to be intelligent, I'm sorry."

You certainly are.

"call me elitist, but a C average person who can't speak is not good enough. I'll vote accordingly."

Yea.  Cursed Yale.  Cursed Harvard.  "Letting in morons since the 60s!"  That's their new motto.

I notice you left most of my post untouched.

You know, I was raised in the conservative environment of Lutheran Schools from 1st Grade on.  I've never been outside the Lutheran system.  And yet my parents were democratic liberals and are to this day.   When I went to college, my parents were on strike.  The unions at the newspapers there in town felt that they had a raw deal.  Security forces affiliated with then Pres. Bush harrased my friends and relatives on the picket line.

I had every reason to despise Bush and Republicanism and conservatism from my experiences at home (real poverty, buddy) and every reason to despise Clinton- according to you- as part of my Lutheran education.

With such strong forces at work, it cannot be argued that I was taking a reactionary position.

Clinton was elected and the UNIONS LOST.

This was the beginning of my awakening.  Liberalism and the democrats (modern dems, anyway) do not hold the key to success.  My family is still heavily liberal and democratic, seemingly unaware that the libs and democrats and unions sold them down the river.

Some day you'll be a conservative too.

Lutheran Education is good for something, after all.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

The Sasquatch

  • Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +23/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1713
    • Joe's Website
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #23 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

Just one comment, then I'm moving on...

I would contend that Clinton is as responsible for this recession as anyone.
I would contend that Presidents have very little to do with the health ofthe economy. This recession, for instance, is due mostly to the inevitable downturn our economy was certainly going to have to face after such a long,booing period. Economies are cyclical and we had been on the rise for along time. The terrorist attacks had something to do with it. Clinton's big govt programs had something to do with it. Bush's tax cuts had something to do with it too. But mostly it was us.

Alright...continue with the ranting and raving.
Logged

nrthsll

  • Frequent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 323
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #24 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

Of course, your right.  Guess I shoulda expanded on the "as much as anyone" thing.  Inasmuch as the president can influence the economy in either direction, Clinton did so negatively towards the end of his 2nd term.  

To throw a conspiracy theory into the mix...what if he did so to make whichever candidate was elected (dem or rep) look bad because of a failing economy.  Hellary gets tuned up in NY, then they (the Billary cartell) come in to save the day in 2004 or 2008, whichever one looks most opportune.
Logged

LPFanKabe

  • Predominant User
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 618
    • http://www.daenzer.org
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #25 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

Quote from: sntjohnny
Libya proves that we are credible with those that matter.   You aren't suggesting we go to war with China, are you?  Because that's what attacking NK is all about.

BTW, I'm all for laying down the smack with China.  I just think you raise points because you think that they show some weakness in Bush, not because of some merit to the point.


YES! exactly. If Bush's war is one on "terrorism" we will be attacking on all fronts. If Bush's War is one of troops: A Physical War, as it is, we should be physically attacking on all fronts. Bush is inconsistent in his choice of who we attack.... What, do we have to work our way up to China? Train our troops in Iraq for a while? Or is the risk of China too great? Would we lose too many people and create another vietnam? (That would be fine if the cause was worth it....) We still aren't doing anything about the IRA. How come you always ignore this johnny?

This is QUOTE a WAR ON TERRORISM. If it is, all terrorism everywhere is the target. Right? There is no Nation "Terrorism" out there in the middle east that we're attacking. It's a concept, a way of life, a method, an ideal. We're fighting that.. no, we're waging "war" with it. War is full-scale.... it's not just skirmish here and skirmish there. Bush is very selective about which Terrorists he wants to pursue... By the way, Saddam only was a terrorist to his own people... not the case with the IRA.

Quote
"By the way, Having the country being run by Bush makes me sick and scared k?"

Buy a gun.  That's what I did.


I hope you're not suggesting one of the 2 things I could take that to mean.... And I'd only buy a gun in anticipation of a Zombie Attack :)

Quote
"Bush sounds like a moron. I want my president to be intelligent, I'm sorry."

You certainly are.

"call me elitist, but a C average person who can't speak is not good enough. I'll vote accordingly."

Yea.  Cursed Yale.  Cursed Harvard.  "Letting in morons since the 60s!"  That's their new motto.


Cursed ANG.... "Letting in priveledged draft-dodging morons since the 60s!" That's their new motto too. Bush IS making a difference. Hey, it's ok.... Bush has a CUW degree he earned too now.....

Quote
You know, I was raised in the conservative environment of Lutheran Schools from 1st Grade on.  I've never been outside the Lutheran system.  And yet my parents were democratic liberals and are to this day.   When I went to college, my parents were on strike.  The unions at the newspapers there in town felt that they had a raw deal.  Security forces affiliated with then Pres. Bush harrased my friends and relatives on the picket line.

I had every reason to despise Bush and Republicanism and conservatism from my experiences at home (real poverty, buddy) and every reason to despise Clinton- according to you- as part of my Lutheran education.

With such strong forces at work, it cannot be argued that I was taking a reactionary position.

Clinton was elected and the UNIONS LOST.

This was the beginning of my awakening.  Liberalism and the democrats (modern dems, anyway) do not hold the key to success.  My family is still heavily liberal and democratic, seemingly unaware that the libs and democrats and unions sold them down the river.

Some day you'll be a conservative too.

Lutheran Education is good for something, after all.


Thanks for telling me my future johnny.

GHWB is not Conservative. He might be Republican, but he's not Conservative.
Logged
Leitourgia Divina adiaphora non est!

cimics

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +9/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1107
    • http://home.roadrunner.com/~cimics
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #26 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

GHWB is not Conservative. He might be Republican, but he's not Conservative.

Um...what does Bush senior have to do with this discussion.  ;)
Logged

The Sasquatch

  • Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +23/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1713
    • Joe's Website
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #27 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

GHWB is not Conservative. He might be Republican, but he's not Conservative.


Logged

LPFanKabe

  • Predominant User
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 618
    • http://www.daenzer.org
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #28 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

bah... where'd that h come from... i swear i was more alert when i wrote that... *sigh* ROFL copter well deserved....
Logged
Leitourgia Divina adiaphora non est!

jason

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1419
    • http://www.xanga.com/jason_123
The Fate of Rumsfeld
« Reply #29 on: July 21, 2004, 10:45:00 PM »

Quote from: squatchmu

I would contend that Clinton is as responsible for this recession as anyone.
I would contend that Presidents have very little to do with the health ofthe economy. This recession, for instance, is due mostly to the inevitable downturn our economy was certainly going to have to face after such a long,booing period. Economies are cyclical and we had been on the rise for along time. The terrorist attacks had something to do with it. Clinton's big govt programs had something to do with it. Bush's tax cuts had something to do with it too. But mostly it was us.

Alright...continue with the ranting and raving.


good rant.  as an economist-in-training, i approve.  three trophies!
Logged
I have acquired great wisdom, surpassing all my friends, and my heart has had great experience of wisdom and knowledge.  And I applied my heart to know wisdom and to know madness and folly. I perceived that this also is but a striving after wind.

--Paraphrase of Ecclesiastes 1:16,17
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
 

More Details