Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?  (Read 5133 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« on: March 03, 2006, 12:56:59 PM »

Because my topic on "Can you really worship, Love and adore this God?" is being hijacked, I thought I'd start this thread here:

8d82thebone asked :
Shalom I know this is a point you were making for Tony but I'm curious myself as to how you can not see Christ in the Torah?  

shalom replied:
That's a fair question, and the best answer I can give is that I'm not 'reading into' the Hebrew Scriptures to leverage support for a pre-determined notion.

For example, the story of Jesus going into Egypt is 'justified as prophetic' because in Hosea 11 G-d said "I caled my son out of Egypt." That seems perfectly sound if you are a Christian, beliving that Jesus was in Egypt and here there is 1/2 of one verse that "appears" to prove this was all part of a big plan. Believe me, I understand why you could and would think that way.


However, a fuller reading of the text exactly what G-d was talking about. I've added some comments in ( ). "When Israel was a child I loved him, and I called my son out of Egypt. The more I called them (note mine: here the Hebrew uses the plural to denote Israel was the people, not Jacob), the farther they went from me, Sacrificing to the Baals and buring incense to Idols. yet it was I who taugh Ephraim to walk, who took them in my arms; (note mine: the approval of G-d to accept the Egyptian children of Joseph by Jacob). I drew them with human cords, with bands of love; I fostered them like one wo raises an infact to his cheeks; Yet, though i stopped to feed my child, they did not know that I was their healer."


Tony's reply:
Here is Adam Clark'scommentary on the Bible concerning this passage "Out of Egypt have I called my son..."

Mat 2:15 -
Out of Egypt have I called my son - This is quoted from Hos_11:1, where the deliverance of Israel, and that only, is referred to. But as that deliverance was extraordinary, it is very likely that it had passed into a proverb, so that
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2006, 10:53:26 AM »

Wow, the silence is deafening.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2006, 10:45:58 PM »

Tony,

There is a problem with the commentaries you cited: they were made by christians who don't know the Tanakh. They were written by men who were LOOKING for support for the myth that jesus was the messiah, and that jesus was "written about in every book of the 'Old Testament' ".
The Jews and the Righteous Gentiles who accept Biblical truth that God designated the Jews as God's experts on the Tanakh will not be impressed by the christian's favorite NON-experts whom the christian nevertheless want to assure us ARE experts.
You might as well have quoted Mozart as an expert in Japanese pottery.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2006, 05:07:44 PM »

Quote from: nojc4me
Tony,

There is a problem with the commentaries you cited: they were made by christians who don't know the Tanakh. They were written by men who were LOOKING for support for the myth that jesus was the messiah, and that jesus was "written about in every book of the 'Old Testament' ".
The Jews and the Righteous Gentiles who accept Biblical truth that God designated the Jews as God's experts on the Tanakh will not be impressed by the christian's favorite NON-experts whom the christian nevertheless want to assure us ARE experts.
You might as well have quoted Mozart as an expert in Japanese pottery.


Tony's reply:
So if someone from Nasa writes a critique about Mars it can't be counted on because he works for NASA?

Obviously, njc, your "experts" weren't all that hot because their Messiah came and went! LOL!
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #4 on: March 07, 2006, 10:10:47 PM »

Tony replied:

So if someone from Nasa writes a critique about Mars it can't be counted on because he works for NASA?

No, you missed the point.
Christians know all about the Mithra myths and mistakenly call them "christianity." And they think these myths are truth.
They can read, usually, and think they can read the Hebrew Holy Scriptures in translation and from that understand the original Hebrew text.
They sometimes can even read Hebrew (nobody I know, yourself included).
But they do NOT understand the Hebrew Holy Scriptures.
They therefore are incapable of being relied upon to explain them, nor should the ramblings of christians be used as a guide for teaching the Hebrew Holy Scriptures.
They know as much about the Tanakh as Mozart did about Japanese pottery.
Nasa scientists can claim to speak with some authority on Mars because they can look at the evidence and make deductions therefrom. But their theories are just that, and must be rejected and replaced when flatly refuted by other, new evidence.
Average Jews know a lot more about the Hebrew Holy Scriptures than any ten thousand christians combined. They have been studying it for 3,500 years, after all. They are experts. The evidence the christian theories need to contend with is not just new Jewish evidence, but the ancient Jewish evidence as well.
No christian could hope to compare to 3,500 years of experience delving into the Hebrew Holy Scriptures.
Any christian theory that is in conflict with a Jewish teaching must fall to  conflicting Jewish teaching.

Obviously, njc, your "experts" weren't all that hot because their Messiah came and went! LOL!

Ha, ha, ha. That's funny! The funny part is that it's ludicrous. Therein lies the humor. That a relative ignoramous could hope to outwit an intelligent and informed expert.
Here's what you just said:
"God told the Jews to expect a human king of the lineage of David who would win wars and regather the dispersed Israelite tribes and rebuilt the Temple, and reinstuitute Temople sacrifices for sins and thanksgiving.
"Along came rumors of a man/god of uncertain lineage who was king of nowhere, fought no wars, much less won any, in whose days no Israelite Tribes were regathered, and who died without building any Temple, and whose death was allegedly a replacement for the Temple sacrifices."

And yet the christians don't understand why the Jews didn't drop God's promises and accept the rumors and jesus as their messiah.
Yep. That's a hoot! That's the funniest thing in the world!
ROTFLMAO!
Hoo! Now I've got a stitch in my side!
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2006, 08:24:59 AM »

Tony wrote:

So if someone from Nasa writes a critique about Mars it can't be counted on because he works for NASA?

njc replied:
No, you missed the point.
Christians know all . . . And they think . . . They can read, . . . and think. . . they can read . . .and . . .understand the original Hebrew text.
They . . . can . . . read Hebrew . . . . They know . . . about the Tanakh. . . . (I, Tony, took the liberty of taking out the unneeded words you typed. :) )
Average Jews know a lot more about the Hebrew Holy Scriptures than any ten thousand christians combined. They have been studying it for 3,500 years, after all. They are experts. The evidence the christian theories need to contend with is not just new Jewish evidence, but the ancient Jewish evidence as well.
No christian could hope to compare to 3,500 years of experience delving into the Hebrew Holy Scriptures.
Any christian theory that is in conflict with a Jewish teaching must fall to  conflicting Jewish teaching.

Tony's reply:
Oh, O.K. then the Christian Jews who believe Jesus is the true Messiah should be trusted since they know Hebrew better than you and most Jews today that don't even open their Hebrew bibles but just trust what some rabbi says. Thank you for clearing that up!

Tony's wrote:
Obviously, njc, your "experts" weren't all that hot because their Messiah came and went! LOL!

njc replied:
Ha, ha, ha. That's funny! The funny part is that it's ludicrous. Therein lies the humor. That a relative ignoramous could hope to outwit an intelligent and informed expert.

Tony's reply:
If you are an expert I sure feel sorry for those you represent. I'm sure they are blushing as well.

njc continues:
Here's what you [njc] just said:
"God told the Jews to expect a human king of the lineage of David who would win wars and regather the dispersed Israelite tribes and rebuilt the Temple, and reinstuitute Temople sacrifices for sins and thanksgiving.
"Along came rumors of a man/god of uncertain lineage who was king of nowhere, fought no wars, much less won any, in whose days no Israelite Tribes were regathered, and who died without building any Temple, and whose death was allegedly a replacement for the Temple sacrifices."

Tony's reply:
What's a "Temople sacrifice"? Is that one of your "expert renderings"? LOL!

In the voice of the robot of "Lost in Space": "Danger Will Robinson! No Scriptures given by njc!"

According to Daniel's prophecy that from the going forth of the word so many years would pass before Jerusalem would be rebuilt.  The temple was rebuilt in Herod's day before Messiah came. Then the temple was destroyed and Jesus raised it up again.
"Jesus answered and said to them, "Raze this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."
The Jews, then, said, "In forty and six years was this temple built, and you will be raising it up in three days!" Yet He said it concerning the temple of His body. When, then, He was roused from among the dead, His disciples are reminded that He said this, and they believe the scripture and the word which Jesus said" (Joh 2:19-22).
Since the Bible says: "God does not dwell in temples made of hands" the true temple was Christ in which God dwelt.

njc wrote:
And yet the christians don't understand why the Jews didn't drop God's promises and accept the rumors and jesus as their messiah.
Yep. That's a hoot! That's the funniest thing in the world!
ROTFLMAO!
Hoo! Now I've got a stitch in my side!

Tony's reply:
Well, since you aren't a Jew, how would you know anything? Yet you put yourself forth as an expert. You say "the Jews didn't drop God's promises and accept the rumors and Jesus as their Messiah." Yet in Christ's day tens of thousands did and they were inherently zealous for the law. And since that time I would not doubt that tens of thousands if not more believed and do believe today as is evident in the "Jews for Jesus" movement. You can laugh all you want but at least I get the last laugh.
Tony
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2006, 08:51:54 PM »

Tony said:

No, you missed the point. Christians know all . . . And they think . . . They can read, . . . and think. . . they can read . . .and . . .understand the original Hebrew text.
They . . . can . . . read Hebrew . . . . They know . . . about the Tanakh. . .
. (I, Tony, took the liberty of taking out the unneeded words you typed. :) )


You didn't do too bad a job, but you forgot to correct for punctuation.
It should be this:
"Christians [are] know [-it-] all . . . And they think . . . they can read, . . . and think. . . they can . . .understand the original Hebrew text... [and that] they . . . can . . . read Hebrew . . . . [and that] they know . . . about the Tanakh. . . "
Yep. That's pretty much what I said, and in fewer words. Thanks for the help.

Christian Jews who believe Jesus is the true Messiah should be trusted since they know Hebrew better than you...

Nope. That I don't know Hebrew has nothing to do with anything. The experts are the Rabbis and Levites who do know Hebrew and the TaNaKH.
Those foolish christian Jews are not to be credited because they have accepted answers to questions the other way than they were decided centuries ago. Since the questions have already been answered, the is no virtue in accepting the rejected position.
Would you suggest we all Follow the tax advice of Irwin Schiff, 1 regardless of what the IRS and the courts have decided? And we should do it because his opinion is more pleasing to you?

... and most Jews today that don't even open their Hebrew bibles but just trust what some rabbi says.

What "most Jews" don't know about their Bible is not the issue.

Thank you for clearing that up!

You're welcome.

According to Daniel's prophecy that from the going forth of the word so many years would pass before Jerusalem would be rebuilt. The temple was rebuilt in Herod's day before Messiah came.

That's obvious, since the messiah has not yet come. But it was destroyed again, so obviously it will have to be rebuilt yet another time.

Then the temple was destroyed and Jesus raised it up again.

False. Your "precious" jesus was dead (if he ever lived) by the time the Temple was destroyed, so he was "unavailable" as a contractor to rebuild it, and it has still not been rebuilt.

"Jesus answered and said to them, "Raze this temple, and in three days I will raise it up."

Yet another of his many false prophecies.
It never happened.

Since the Bible says: "God does not dwell in temples made of hands" the true temple was Christ in which God dwelt.

The Temple was that big building in Jerusalem, the one on the Temple Mount. You know, the center of Temple worship. That's sort of why they called it that, silly!
Now, it MAY be true to say that God "dwells" in the heart of the righteous, but that would exclude the sinner, jesus!
And besides, he never did raise that particular "temple." It's just a myth.

Well, since you aren't a Jew, how would you know anything?

Because, well, I asked them!

Yet you put yourself forth as an expert.

No, I didn't. I am certain I cite the Rabbis, and I know I will sometimes admit when I'm expressing my own opinions. I rarely if ever present myself as an expert in any subject!

You say "the Jews didn't drop God's promises and accept the rumors and Jesus as their Messiah." Yet in Christ's day tens of thousands did

A) The numbers of those who accepted jesus are very likely to be highly inflated.
B) I am gratified that you admit that, by accepting jesus, those few who did, "drop[ped] God's promises" and "accept[ed] ... rumors" in doing so.
I know you didn't "mean to say that," but I'll take the truth anyhow I can get it out of you.

and they were inherently zealous for the law.

And when the false prophet Paul wrote words into the mouth of Peter, words of a "dream" in which somebody (we know not whom) tried to convince Peter to teach that the dietary laws of the Torah were to be ignored, many of the Jewish "believers" who "were inherently zealous for the law" bailed out of christianity just as fast as they could. They could finally see that it was a false religion.
And when that other famous prophecy of his "soon return" failed to come about, even more Jews abandoned the false religion.
It didn't even help when some "gospel" writer made the literary character called "jesus" allegedly predict he would return before the death of "some" people standing there allegedly listening to the promise. They probably just knew for sure it was another lie in a long string of lies they had been told by believers in the false messiah, jesus.
______________
1 http://www.paynoincometax.com/
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47027
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2006, 05:30:22 AM »

njc,
your thinking is so screwed up it is really hard to find a point to begin to help you.

If the Messiah did not come (and He did) but let's just for the sake or argument say you are right that the Messiah did not come when Gabriel went to Daniel and in Daniel 9 tells Daniel just how much longer it will be before Messiah comes. Jesus is the only one that could be the One that came when the fullness of that time was.

But let's just say you are correct that no Messiah came to fulfill Daniel's prophecy. This leaves us with some startling concludiong:

1) Gabriel lied.
2) Daniel lied.
3) God lied.
4) the Old Testament cannot be trusted because it is the little book of lies.

or
5) njc is the supreme liar and gets his lies from his sources.

I think I'll stick with number 5 on that one.

Tony
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2006, 12:15:18 PM »

Tony N said:

If the Messiah did not come ... when Gabriel went to Daniel and in Daniel 9 tells Daniel just how much longer it will be before Messiah comes. Jesus is the only one that could be the One that came when the fullness of that time was.

You're taking a prophecy that Daniel himself didn't understand, applying it however you want to, making up your own starting point, making up your own calculations, and eliminating all other potential candidates to come to that conclusion.
Or so it seems to me.
Care to explain your postition better?

But let's just say you are correct that no Messiah came to fulfill Daniel's prophecy. This leaves us with some startling concludiong:

1) Gabriel lied.
2) Daniel lied.
3) God lied.
4) the Old Testament cannot be trusted because it is the little book of lies.


Or maybe:
5) The message was conditional.
6) Our understanding of God's message to Daniel is imperfect.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2006, 02:56:20 PM »

Tony N said:

If the Messiah did not come ... when Gabriel went to Daniel and in Daniel 9 tells Daniel just how much longer it will be before Messiah comes. Jesus is the only one that could be the One that came when the fullness of that time was.

njc'w reply:
You're taking a prophecy that Daniel himself didn't understand,
 6) Our understanding of God's message to Daniel is imperfect.[/quote]

Tonys' reply:
Sorry, njc but Daniel understood the prophecy to be concerning the coming Messiah and Gabrael was sent to make him understand it perfectly:

Dan 9:22 And he is approaching and speaking with me, saying, "Daniel, now I fare forth to give you an intelligent understanding."
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2006, 09:13:48 PM »

Sorry, njc but Daniel understood the prophecy to be concerning the coming Messiah and Gabrael was sent to make him understand it perfectly:

Dan 9:22 And he is approaching and speaking with me, saying, "Daniel, now I fare forth to give you an intelligent understanding."


Here's what Sam Levine (a Levite, and thus capable of explaining TaNaKH with authority):

Daniel 9:24-27--Here are the quotes from the New Testament: "Seventy weeks are determined upon  thy people and upon the holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation of iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and sixty two weeks; the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troubled times. And after sixty two weeks shall the Messiah be cut off,  but not for himself, and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week, and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even unto the consumation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate."

                This passage is one of their favorites, and by using a few mistranslations and misplaced commas,  they end up with an amazing, though very clever, interpretation. Here is the Christian interpretation:

                The Artaxerxes of Nehemiah 2:1 rose to power in 465 B.C., and so, according to Nehemiah 2:1, the commandment to restore Jerusalem began 20 years later, i.e., 445 B.C. Now, since they claim that a Biblical year had 360 days, they multiply 360 by 483 (69 weeks equals 69 periods of seven years--69 X 7 = 483 years). This equals 173,880 days. To change from Biblical years to our solar years, they divide 173,880 days by 365 1/4; this equals 476 years. Add 476 years to 445 B.C. and you will get 31 A.D. Actually, they add a few days, and it ends up around 32 A.D., which is just when they claim that Jesus was crucified. Thus, Daniel 9:25, when discussing the Messiah, is referring to Jesus, saying that he will be "cut off" i.e., crucified.

                There are really many difficulties with this interpretation, which is why the Jews were never impressed with it.

                The first problem is that the Christians mistranslated the main verse, verse 25. The way they read it is that after seven weeks and sixty two weeks, the Messiah will come; i.e., after 69 weeks, the Messiah will come. The obvious question is--why didn't Daniel simply write 69 weeks, instead of writing 7 plus 62. The answer is that they mistranslated the verse. If you translate it correctly, that question disappears. Here is the correct translation:

                Know and discern that from the going forth of the word to restore and build Jerusalem unto one anointed, a prince, shall be seven weeks; and for sixty two weeks shall it be built again with streets and moats, but in troublesome times. Note the main difference--not that it will take 69 weeks before the Messiah will come, but rather a mere 7 weeks. If you study this in the original Hebrew, this should be quite clear. Thus, the translation by itself answers the above question of why not simply write 69, instead of 7 plus 62.

                According to the correct translation, the anointed one will come after 7 weeks, the city will remain built for 62 weeks, and after the 62 weeks, (verse 26) it will be destroyed. The Christian translation cannot explain why Daniel had to mention the first seven weeks, and in fact it is a mistranslation. Thus, if they show you their version of the Bible, open the original and show them the difference.

                Another major difficulty is that according to the simple, untwisted translation of verse 26, two events were to occur after the 62 weeks--the anointed one would be cut off, and the city and the sanctuary would be destroyed. As you know, Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 A.D., which is 38 years after the death of Jesus -- more than five "weeks" off. There is no acceptable answer for these missing five weeks according to the Christian interpretation.

                Another difficulty is that the Jewish year is not really 360 days long. While the months are based on the lunar patterns, the years must coincide with the solar system. See Maimonides, Laws of Kiddush HaChodesh 1:1, 2 for this, or simply study the Jewish calendar. You will see that since the solar year exceeds the lunar year by around 11 days, there will be an extra month added around every three years. Thus 445 B.C. plus 483 years (69 X 7) ends up 38 A.D., and by then everyone admits that Jesus was already dead.

                Another difficulty is that the Christians, for lack of a better aswer, claim that the 70th week will take place when Jesus returns in his second coming as a king. The problem was caused because Daniel mentioned a total of 70 weeks, and then he specified 7 plus 62, leaving one remaining. The Christians say that the first 69 weeks were consecutive, then there is at least a 1900 year gap, and sooner or later the 70th week will occur. This is obviously a very forced explanation, born of desperation.

                There is one other point that should be made. On examining the other books of the Bible, it becomes quite apparent that Daniel is referring to Cyrus, of Persia, and not Jesus. In Jeremiah 25:11, 12, the word of God clearly states that the Babylonian exile will last for only 70 years. In Ezra 1: 1, it says that "Now in the first year of Cyrus, king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be fulfilled, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus, king of Persia, that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom... saying... Whosoever there is among you of all His people, let him go to Jerusalem, and build the house of the Lord..." In Isaiah 45:1, it says, "Thus saith the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus..." Thus, Isaiah, in the name of God, calls Cyrus an anointed one, and Ezra discusses how Cyrus fulfilled the prophecy of Jeremiah. Since Daniel lived after Isaiah and Jeremiah, but before the period of Ezra,it it is most reasonable and probable to affirm that the anointed one that he referred to in Daniel 9:25 is Cyrus, and not Jesus.

                The reason why a Christian would have difficulty understanding this is because the compiler of the King James Bible was a shrewd person. In the original Hebrew, both Daniel 9:25 and Isaiah 45:1 use the exact same word -- "moshiach." However, in the Christian version of the Old Testament, the word,"moshiach," is translated in Isaiah 45:1 as "anointed" whereas in Daniel 9:25, the same Hebrew word is translated as "the Messiah." ("Messiah" is the Anglicized version of "Moshiach"; the pure translation of "Moshiach" is "an anointed one.") This deceptive translating makes it virtually impossible for the innocent reader who does not know Hebrew to discern the truth. In addition, the compiler of the Christian Bible did one other clever maneuver. The sequence of the various books of the Bible are arranged in the Christian Bible in a rather peculiar manner: the Pentateuch, Samuel, Chronicles, then Ezra, and then Esther, Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, and then Daniel. (In the Jewish Bible, Ezra follows all of the above.) The reason for placing Ezra in the Christian Bible before Isaiah, and before Psalms, Proverbs, etc., even though Ezra lived long after those books were written is presumably to fool the reader of the Christian Bible. Had the reader read Ezra immediately after Daniel, which is the correct chronological location, the reader would immediately recognize that Ezra 1:1 and Daniel 9:25 refer to Cyrus, and not Jesus.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #11 on: March 28, 2006, 05:27:55 AM »

Well, ghee, njc, what would I expect? Most Jews don't want Jesus to be the Messiah so they contort things and bend over backwards to make Dan.9 work out that Jesus is not their Messiah.

I checked my Masoretic text and it is not as that "Levite" says.

Here's some food for thought:

"It is of the first importance to observe that the Seventy Sevens, while covering, are yet cut off from the whole period of Gentile supremacy, and are set apart for Jewish affairs. They are decreed with special reference to a special People, a special city, a special purpose
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2006, 05:53:20 PM »

I fear I'm in danger of being lapped as frontrunner for the suggested new Title: "Monologue."
http://redwing.hutman.net/%7Emreed/warriorshtm/tirelessrebutter.htm
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2006, 11:30:47 AM »

No, I was just trying to tie you for 1st place for flame warrior.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2006, 12:53:51 PM »

Well, congratulations!
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2006, 09:09:00 PM »

Tony N said:

Well, [gee], njc, what would I expect? Most Jews don't want Jesus to be the Messiah so they contort things and bend over backwards to make Dan.9 work out that Jesus is not their Messiah.

It's got nothing to do with whether a person wants to believe jesus was the messiah or not; he was or he wasn't.
Most Jews don't care one whit about jesus, and don't see any need to do anything to "make jesus not be the messiah."
Why should anybody need to "contort things and bend over backwards to make Dan.9 work out that Jesus is not their Messiah," when it's as obvious as the nose one one's face that he was not the messiah? Sound like whipping a dead horse, if you ask me.
And how could the failure of a single prophecy to apply to jesus "make jesus NOT be the messiah," if indeed he was the messiah?
Your comment doesn't make sense on any level at all!

I checked my Masoretic text and it is not as that "Levite" says.

Now, since you've proved you don't understand Hebrew, nor do you respect the TaNaKH, why should anyone take your word for it what the Masoretic says or doesn't say?

Here's some food for thought:

"It is of the first importance to observe that the Seventy Sevens, ... have nothing to do with Gentile development.


Says who? The Rabbis (who would know) don't seem to say any such thing, but some do say something very different. At least one says Cyrus was the first of the anointed ones mentioned in the prophecy.

Verse 25. ...unto Prince Messiah (shall be) Sevens seven; and sevens sixty and two; she shall be restored and built, broad place and rampart, and in distress (shall be) the times.

That should actually read:
" ... .unto [AN anointed, A] Prince (shall be) Seven sevens..."

Verse 26. And, after those sevens sixty and two, shall Messiah be cut off,

That should read:
"...Verse 26. And, after those sevens sixty and two, shall [A] messiah be cut off, ..."
There is no reason to believe that the messiah first mentioned was the same one who was cut off, especially if there was a passage of time reaching the length of 69 "sevens"...
But, if they were taken to be the same messiah, it would rule jesus out, because he didn't come at the start of the 69 sevens. Even the most credulous of christians must admit that point.
So at the least we have two messiahs.

... and (there shall be) nothing for Him...

The words v'ayn lo (9:26) are incorrectly translated by the King James Version as "but not for himself." They should be translated as "he has nothing" or "he shall have nothing." There are Christian commentators who maintain this phrase has both meanings, but that claim cannot be supported grammatically.
Question: How can Christians apply the phrase v'ayn lo, "he has nothing" or "he shall have nothing" (Daniel 9:26) and Isaiah 53:12, where the suffering servant receives "a portion with the great," to Jesus?

... and the city and the sanctuary shall the people of the coining prince...

What's "a 'coining' prince"? One who mints coins?

The one assumption, so utterly false, that the Seventy Sevens flow on, like an unbroken river,

Who says it's "utterly false"? A christian?! Since they're obviously ill informed and deceived, why should their report be credited? There is no indication whatsoever that there should be a period of 2 millennia (so far) between the end of the "69 sevens" and the start of the final "seven."
Note, however that they are separate from the first seven. It's a strong indication that there are more than one "anointed" being mentioned.

... The crime of Messiah's rejection...

Where is the word, "rejection" used in the prophecy?

... results in the redestruction of the city and temple, and redispersion of the guilty nation for a long period succeeding.

This seems a baseless accusation. The implication is that the "guilty nation" (presumably the Jews) were the ones who "rejected" the anointed one. Nothing in the prophecy says any such thing.
Sure, they could be considered to have been "guilty," but there's no reason to believe their "crime" was rejecting a messiah. In fact, based on other teachings by prophets in the TaNaKH, it's more likely their crime was in rejecting God's Laws.
Why, then, should anybody believe that God would have been upset with the Jews' rejection of the false prophet jesus, who preached against keeping God's Laws, and who repeated made excuses for others, AND FOR HIMSELF, when they were challenged for not keeping God's Laws?

After the conclusion of the sixty-two sevens (sixty-nine sevens if we add the seven sevens)—

Finally, after wasting time babbling on and on, the author decided to get to the crux of the christian's false teaching about Daniel's "Sevens" prophecy: 69 is expressed as 7 plus 62.
NOBODY in the WORLD calls 69 "7 plus 62" afaik
There are/were people who called 20 a "score."
And there were those who called 120 a "long hundred."
There are people who call 144 a "gross."
And there are still today people who call 12 a "dozen".
But NOBODY calls 69 "7 plus 62."
If we look at it, we might see 69 as "7 sevens plus a score." That might make sense.
But that wouldn't fit in with the prophecy, nor would it tend to suggest that the sssinister, sssserpentine ssssinner jesus was a messiah or something.
So they need to make up their own counting system. One the Jews never used.
That's hardly impressive or convincing, now is it?
Besides, the Hebrew text separated the 7 from the 62, so the "binding" of the two numbers into one by the christians is not supported by the Original language used. It's not even supported by the Greek LXX!!!! If the prophecy had wanted to say "69," it would have simply said, "69." It doesn't. It says, "7" in one place and "62" in another. Unless I miss my guess, the two numbers aren't even side-by-side.

It is as clear as noonday that the seventieth seven is chronologically severed from immediate sequence upon the sixty-ninth, three great events taking place in the interim—Messiah's death, Jerusalem's destruction, a period of war and desolations.

False. It's plain as day that there is no separation at all, except as dividing line demarking certain specified events. And there's certainly no reason to believe there should be a space of two thousand years or more between the "two" time periods ("7 sevens plus 62 sevens" and another "7"). Apparently, christians do it because that's the only way to make this prophecy allow jesus (or some other false messiah) to fail, die, and come back some time in the distant future for another try.
As with the "shoot.the arrow first and paint the target around wherever the arrow lands" ploy, the christians seem fond of forcing the prophecy to fit the facts, rather than the other way around; that is, allowing the facts to fit into the prophecy naturally.

The Scripture Year has 360 Days...  Prophetic years of 360 days; not our years of 365 days.

False. This is pure ignorance on display.
As anybody can tell, the Jewish year must conform to the seasons. The Harvest Festival MUST take place during the harvest season, for example. For this reason, the Jewish calendar adds a month on certain years, and leaves this extra month out in others.
The up-shot is, the average length of a Jewish year is 365.25 days or so, not just 360.
The MUSLIM year doesn't conform to the seasons, and so their festivals move about every year until they come back to the same season as they had been held decades earlier.
But the Jews don't use the Muslim calendar.
As I said before, the christians are playing around with the math so as to force the prophecy to support the christian's preconceived claim that the prophecy refers to the false messiah, jesus, rather than showing that this jesus person conforms to the prophecy naturally.
Also, there's no such thing as a "Prophetic Year" mentioned anywhere in Scripture nor in Rabbinic Oral Tradition, afaik. The christians made it (this so-caled "Prophetic Year") up to force the prophecy fit the time when christians claim that jesus (their only acceptable candidate for "messiah") allegedly lived.

The flood commenced on the seventeenth day of the second month (+Gen.7:11), and the ark rested on Mount Ararat on the seventeenth day of the seventh month (+Gen.8:4). It is the same date each month, with five months rolling between; but the time is specified as p106

If that made any sense, I would respond, but I know of nowhere in Scripture where ANY time period is "specified as 'page 106.' "

The rebuilding of the city is not as much as mooted.

Huh? If something is "moot," it's unimportant or arguable. What sense does this make to you to say the rebuilding of the city is unimportant? What are you trying to say, and why don't you just say it?

Hence to take any of these decrees as the starting point of the Seventy Sevens is to disregard the angel's word and to plunge headlong into confusion.

What kind of sense does this make? Why can't you take one of those decrees as the one God was refering to?
Oh, I get it! Because then, the calculations won't work out so that your zombie-god fits the prophecy!
"Let God be true, and every man a LIAR!"
"You can't force a square peg into a round hole."
And other cliches that simply mean the same thing.
The decree went out with Cyrus, and the calculations (made by trusting the prophecy, rather than forcing them, as you're doing) work out just fine!

This "word" of Artaxerxes is the starting point of the Seventy Sevens.

False. The decree went out with Cyrus.

This fact excludes His birth, baptism, or beginning of public ministry. These were but important landmarks leading to His presentation of Himself as King, which took place at the time of His entry into Jerusalem. A glance at Luke's gospel shows our Lord's journey to Jerusalem to have been an event of paramount importance.

IOW, the points in the prophecy are forced to fit the gospel accounts, and/or the gospel accounts force christians to pick and choose which of them will be chosen as points in the prophecy.
They shot their arrows and only then drew the targets around them where they landed!

"Shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: Behold,
the king cometh unto thee: he is just, and
having salvation" (+Zech.9:9).


Making up prophecies to your liking so as to prove your lies are true won't help you convince anybody with a brain.
You might convince pagans and christians that way, though..
Zexhariah 9:9 actually reads,
"Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Ziyyon; shout O daughter of Yerushalayim: behold, thy king comes to thee: he us just, and victorious; humble, and riding upon an [a$$], and upon a colt, the foal of an [a$$]."
Points to remember:
The sinner jesus was never anointed king, so this doesn't apply to him.
The sinner jesus was not just, [1] so this doesn't apply to him.
The sinner jesus was never victorious (as in battle, as was expected of the real messiah), so this doesn't apply to him.
The sinner jesus was not humble, [2] so this doesn't apply to him.
Riding an [a$$] in the days when doing so was commonplace hardly proves anything about anyone.

Sir R. Anderson has shown by irrefragable historical and astronomical evidence, that the first Nisan in the twentieth year of Artaxerxes (the decree to rebuild Jerusalem) was 14th of March, B. C. 445. The 10th Nisan in Passion Week (Christ's entry into Jerusalem) was 6th April, A. D. 32. The intervening period between these dates was 476 years and 24 days.

Unfortunately for you, there's no evidence jesus ever lived, nor is there any historical evidence any such even took place.
And there's no such thing as a "prophetic year" of 360 days.

The beginning of the one seven, still future, required to complete the seventy,

Ultimately, this one line shows that even christians must realize that the prophecy has not been fulfilled, and so it cannot apply to jesus any more than it applies to me. All I have to do is assert that it will be fulfilled in my own future days.

Three "princes" are prominent in this prophecy: (1) Messiah; (2) the Coming Prince; (3) the Desolator. Messiah appeared during the sixty-two sevens. The Coming Prince—coming at the time the prediction was given—appeared early in the gap separating the last seven from the sixty-nine. That prince was Titus, whose people destroyed city and temple.

I am confused. How does the commentator account for the several years between the death of the sinner jesus and the destruction of Jerusalem, the time of the "prince" "Titus"? There were (apparently) approximately 40 years between the two events. Where are these more than 5 but less than 6 "sevens" prophecied in Daniel's book? And why are they not representative of an exact seven year period?
-----
 
[1] Several of his parables and some of his personal acts show he was not just. The

[2] Read it and weep:
Jo 6:35 And J[.C.] said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
Jo 6:40 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Jo 6:48 I am that bread of life.
Jo 6:54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
Jo 6:55 For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
Jo 8:12 Then spake J[.C.] again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world:
Jo 8:24 I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.
Jo 8:58 J[.C] said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
Jo 10:7 Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.
Jo 10:9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.
Jo 10:10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.
Jo 10:11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
Jo 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
Jo 10:28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
Jo 10:30 I and my Father are one.
Jo 11:25 J[.C.] said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
Jo 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.  [What? He did not say, "I will draw men to G-d"?]
Jo 12:46 I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness.
Jo 14:6 J[.C] saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. [He thus magnified himself above all the other prophets, including Moshe.]
Jo 14:13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
Jo 14:14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it. [What? "He" will do it? Moshe admitted that he was not the one who worked miracles, but that it was G-d Who worked through him..Here, Yeshu ha-Mamzer claims he does the work!] Jo 15:1 I am the true vine,
Matthew and Mark also record several instances of the sinner jesus magnifying his own importance beyond the reality.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2006, 09:31:34 PM »

The correct understanding of this prophecy from Daniel chapter 9 can be found by looking around here:

http://www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/faq118.html
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2006, 04:35:13 AM »

Dear njc, here are some good ideas as to why we believe Daniel 9 really is about the true Messiah of Israel Who already came. It quotes a couple of rabbis (Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon, and Rabbi Moses Abraham Levi) who believed that Daniel 9 prophecy was concerning Messiah.

What follows is from 100prophecies.org    
 
Daniel's "Seventy Weeks" prophecy
Below is a detailed look at Daniel 9:24-27. Much of our commentary below is based on Josh McDowell's book, "The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict", pages 197-201:

PART ONE:
A chronological summary of Daniel 9:24-26

1. There would be a decree to rebuild Jerusalem.
2. Jerusalem and the Temple would be rebuilt.
3. Then an anointed one (messiah) would be "cut off" (an idiom for "rejected" or "killed").
4. Then Jerusalem and the Temple would be destroyed again.

I came up with this summary after reading various renderings of this verse in various translations of the Christian Bible and of the Jewish Tanakh. (The Tanakh is the Jewish Bible; it contains the writings of what we Christians refer to as the Old Testament). I believe that this chronology fits most of the renderings that I have seen, whether they are translations by Christians or by Judaists. My summary is in no way original - many Christians, such as Josh McDowell, have come up with the same chronology long before I did.

PART TWO:
A summary of how Daniel 9:24-26 was fulfilled

All of these events later happened, in the same order in which they are described in Daniel 9:24-26:

1. After the Medo-Persians had conquered the Babylonian empire about 2540 years ago, they ruled a vast empire that included the land of Israel. About 2446 years ago (about 445 BC), Persian king Artaxerxes gave permission to the Jews to rebuild Jerusalem, which was still in ruins after having been destroyed earlier by the Babylonians.

2. The Jews rebuilt the Temple and the city of Jerusalem.

3. Then, in about 33 AD, Jesus entered Jerusalem as the Messiah who had been promised by Old Testament prophets. But, many people rejected Jesus as the Messiah and He was crucified by the Romans.

4. About 40 years after Jesus was crucified, the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and the Temple. (The Temple has not been rebuilt since then).

PART THREE:
How Daniel 9:24-26 was "Fulfilled to the day" according to scholars such as Josh McDowell

First, McDowell, and other scholars, separate the prophecy into three parts:

1. The "7 sevens" in Daniel 9:25.

2. The "62 sevens" in Daniel 9:25.

3. And the 70th "seven" in Daniel 9:27.

Then, they combine the first two periods for a total of 69 "sevens." They combined the first two periods because it is at after the completion of those two periods that the anointed one appears, and that's what we are trying to calculate - when the anointed one was supposed to appear.

Next, they interpret the "sevens" as "seven years" or periods of seven years, rather than a period of seven days or seven weeks or seven months. Part of the reason that this is interpreted as "years" is because of the reference to "years" in Daniel 9:2. (Daniel 9:2 refers to the "seventy years" prophecy that Jeremiah spoke of in Jeremiah 25).

PART FOUR:
The mathematics of calculating Daniel 9:24-26 and the issue of the 360-day "prophetic" calendar

At this point, we're adding the 7 "sevens" and the 62 "sevens" for a total of 69 "sevens". And we are interpreting the 69 "sevens" to mean 69 periods of seven years, for a total of 483 years. So, we are saying that there would be a period of 483 years from the time that a decree is given to rebuild Jerusalem to the time that a Messiah is to appear.

Some Christian scholars say that the period of 483 years should not be thought of in terms of our modern solar calendar which is based on a 365.25 days to a year. Instead, we are to use a "prophetic" calendar which has 360 days to a year. Many ancient calendars, including the Jewish calendar, was based on a lunar year of 12 months, with each month lasting 30 days each. Many ancient peoples, including the ancient Jews, did realize that there actually were more than 360 days to a year and so they would tack on an extra five days at some point during the year.

Another reason some scholars say that we should apply a 360-day calendar to Daniel's prophecy is because of various Bible references that allude to a fixed 30-day month view of time. For example, in Genesis 7:24, it says that the flood lasted 150 days. And, in Genesis 7:11, it says the flood began in the 17th day of the second month. And in Genesis 8:4, it says that the flood subsided on the 17th day of the seventh month, when the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. So, these passages present us a 5-month period of time that is described as being 150 days in length. And that of course is five 30-day months.

There are other Bible passages that indicate that time is being measured in fixed 30-day month periods. Revelation 12:6 mentions a 1,260 day period which, in my view, clearly relates to the three-and-a-half-year period mentioned in Revelation 12:13-14 and in Daniel 9:27. For three-and-a-half years to equal 1,260 days, one would have to measure years in 360-day increments. That of course doesn't mean that the earth's orbit of the sun is going to speed up or change, it just simply means that the prophetic year is a measure of time in which a "year" has 360 days, nothing more, nothing less. It's no different than weighing a bag of groceries using the metric system of kilograms and then using the old English system of pounds and ounces. It is not that one system causes the groceries to weigh more or less, but rather the two systems describe the weight in different units. So too does the prophetic year in comparison to our solar calendar - it uses a different system to measure time.

So, we take the 483 years that we had calculated earlier and we multiply the 483 by 360. In other words, we are viewing the 483 year period described in Daniel 9:25 as "prophetic years" of 360 days each. And, 483 times 360 equals 173,880. And that gives us a total of 173,880 days.

Now, we want to apply these 173,880 days to our calendar, which has 365.25 days to a year. Why? So that we can use our calendar in trying to figure out the year that this part of Daniel's prophecy was to begin its fulfillment and when this part of Daniel's prophecy was to be completed. So, we divide the 173,880 days into years of 365.25 days. And, that equals 476 (solar) years. Now, we need to figure out when this 476 year period was supposed to begin.

PART FIVE:
When was Daniel's "69 weeks of years" supposed to begin?

At this point we are trying to figure out when the 476-year period begins. The prophecy in Daniel 9:24-26 begins with a decree to rebuild Jerusalem. Many people have proposed different years for different decrees. And I won't pretend to have the "only correct answer," because I don't know if I have that or not. In any event, here are four decrees that are often discussed in relation to Daniel 9:24-26:

1. The decree from Cyrus in 539 BC. (see Ezra 1:1-4)
2. The decree from Darius in 519 BC. (see Ezra 5:3-7)
3. The decree from Artaxerxes to Ezra in 457 BC. (see Ezra 7:11-16)
4. The decree from Artaxerxes to Nehemiah in 444 BC. (see Nehemiah 2:1-8)

As cited in McDowell's book, a Christian scholar named J.D. Wilson contends that only the decree from Artaxerxes to Nehemiah applies to this prophecy. As cited in McDowell's book, Wilson explains:

" The words of the decree are not given, but its subject matter can easily be determined. Nehemiah hears of the desolate condition of Jerusalem. He is deeply grieved. The King asks the reason. Nehemiah replies, 'the city, the place of my fathers' sepulchres, lieth waste, and the gates thereof are consumed with fire.' The King bids him make request. He does so promptly, asking for an order to from the King that 'I be sent to the city that I may build it.' And, as we read, he was sent, and he rebuilt Jerusalem. "

And so, that is J.D. Wilson's reason for using the Artaxerxes to Nehemiah. The next issue is finding a date for that decree. McDowell, page 199 of his "The New Evidence that Demands a Verdict," reads:

" The decree was given in 444 B.C., based on the following:
1. 'In the month of Nisan, in the twentieth year of King Artaxerxes' (Nehemiah 2:1).
2. Artaxerxes' accession was in 465 B.C.
3. There is not date specified, so according to the Jewish custom the date is understood as the first day of the month, which would be Nisan 1, 444 BC.
4. March 5, 444 B.C. is our corresponding calendar date. "

(Many scholars use the March 5 date, but not all use the 444 BC year. Some use 445 BC as the twentieth year of Artaxerxes. I myself haven't done enough research to decide which year is most likely to be the correct year). Regardless of whether you accept the date as being March 5, 444 BC or March 5, 445 BC, we now have a starting point for Daniel's prophecy.

PART SIX:
When was Daniel's "69 weeks of years" supposed to end?

We are now at the point where we can try to pinpoint when the Messiah was supposed to make his appearance. If we agree on the points that have been made earlier, then we simply calculate 476 years into the future, using 444 BC as the starting point. To do that, if I am not mistaken, we count 443 BC as the first of the 476 years. Why - because the first began in 444 BC and it ended in 443 BC. So we start counting from 443 BC. So, we have 443 years on the BC side of measuring time and that leaves us with 33 years on the AD side to account for the full 476 years. Using this formula, we arrive at 33 AD the year in time in which the Messiah was to appear.

And that would correspond to the time that Jesus rode into Jerusalem on a donkey. The reason the donkey is important is that in Zechariah 9:9, the prophet Zechariah speaks of a King riding a donkey and presenting himself as the King to Jerusalem.

Alfred Edersheim, a Christian Jew who lived during the 1800s, studied ancient Rabbinical writings, and said that Zechariah 9:9 was often interpreted as being about a Messiah. In the book, "The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah," Edersheim wrote: "The Messianic application of this verse in all its parts has already been repeatedly indicated. We may here add that there are many traditions about this donkey on which the Messiah is to ride; and so firm was the belief in it, that, according to the Talmud, `if anyone saw a donkey in his dreams, he will see salvation' (Ber 56 b)."

So then, what better way for a Messiah to announce himself in Jerusalem than to enter the great city on the back of a humble donkey?

There are theories that pinpoint the exact date of the exact year that Jesus rode into Jerusalem. The dates that I have seen in my review of other people's research is April 6, either April 6, 32 AD, or April 6, 33 AD. (And, again, the difference in the year depends on whether the 20th year of Artaxerxes was in 444 BC or 445 BC). And, some scholars have claimed that there is exactly 173,880 days from March 5, 444 BC to April 6, 33 AD (and, 173,880 days from March 5, 445 BC to April 6, 32 AD).

PART SEVEN:
What ancient Rabbis thought of Daniel 9:24-26

I found a Web site that pulls together various ancient writings from Rabbis, commenting on Daniel, chapter 9. That Web site's address is: http://www.inerrancy.org/dan.htm

According to that Web site, at least a handful of ancient Rabbis agree that it is correct to view Daniel 9 as providing a timeline for the arrival of a Messiah. Below are a few examples that I copied verbatim from that Web site:

" 1a. Maimonides (Rabbi Moses Ben Maimon): "Daniel has elucidated to us the knowledge of the end times. However, since they are secret, the wise [rabbis] have barred the calculation of the days of Messiah
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #18 on: April 08, 2006, 06:16:47 AM »

Quote
nojc4me wrote:
I am confused.



Tony's reply:
It is nice that you finally see the problem. But really, I am confused as well. I find it interesting that some rabbis, both modern and ancient, believed that Daniel 9 was about the Messiah. If the Messiah has not come at least in that allotted time than God, Gabriel and Daniel lied.

njc wrote:
How does the commentator account for the several years between the death of the sinner jesus and the destruction of Jerusalem, the time of the "prince" "Titus"? There were (apparently) approximately 40 years between the two events. Where are these more than 5 but less than 6 "sevens" prophecied in Daniel's book? And why are they not representative of an exact seven year period?

Tony's reply:
Dan 9:24-26  Seventy sevens are segregated for your people and for your holy city:To detain transgression, to cause sin to end, to make a propitiatory shelter for depravity; to bring the righteousness of the eons, to seal the vision and the prophet, to anoint the holy of holies."  (25)  And you shall know and be intelligent:From the faring forth of the word to cause a return and to rebuild Jerusalem--from then till Messiah the Governor is seven sevens, and sixty-two sevens. It will return and will be rebuilt, square and salient, even in eras of constraint."  (26)  After the sixty-two sevens, Messiah will be cut off, and there is no adjudication for Him. The city and the holy place shall be laid in ruins with the other governor's coming; then its end is by an overflow, and till the end of the war desolations will be decided."

After 62 sevens Messiah is cut off leaving us 8 sevens remaining. 8 x 7 = 56 years.
Jerusalem destroyed 70 A.D. - 33 A.D. = 37 years.
56
-37
___
19 years extra with which to play with.

I need to research this more for some scholars say that the Messiah that never sinned, Jesus was His name, was cut off in the 69th seven.

Notice that Daniel 9:26 does not say IN the 62 sevens Messiah will be cut off but AFTER.

Here is a very simple chart:

| 7 |...............62..............( [ ] ) | 1/2 | . . . | 1/2 |

The above illustrates 70 sevens of Daniel.

The area in the square brackes is the last couple thousand years of the present secret administration not revealed to Daniel.
 
In the 69th seven Messiah was cut off and then we enter the long era of the Gentiles where the city and temple are destroyed.

After the temple is rebuilt there will be one more 7 year period comprised of two 3 1/2 years. The first 3 1/2 years will be when the anti-christ establishes a covenant with Israel and at the end of that period he causes the sacrifices to cease. Then for 3 1/2 years the true believers are persecuted called the great tribulation or Jacob's trouble.

If this doesn't confuse you even more . . .  :?
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Is Jesus the Messiah. What of OT prophecies?
« Reply #19 on: April 08, 2006, 08:24:26 PM »

The following was taken from the Jews For Judaism site. (q.v.)

Question: Is it true that sixty-nine "weeks" of the Seventy Weeks countdown of Daniel 9 starts in 444 B.C.E. and ends with the death of Jesus (30/33 C.E.)?

Answer: Christian commentators prefer to start the Seventy Weeks countdown with 444 or 445 B.C.E. because it brings their calculations closer to the time period in which Jesus died (30/33 C.E.). A far better starting date is the decree of Cyrus (537 B.C.E) upon which all subsequent grants of approval were based (Isaiah 44:28). A correct reading of the passage and some simple arithmetic dispels any attempt to claim 444 B.C.E. as a starting date and Jesus' death in 30/33 C.E. as a terminus.

First, the seven weeks and the sixty-two weeks are really two separate periods and speak of two separate "anointed" ones. Second, even if we were to count 483 years from 444 B.C.E. we get to the year 38 C.E. Jesus is crucified in the period ranging from 30 to 33 C.E. But, the text of Daniel 9:26 says, "And after the sixty-two weeks an anointed one shall be cut off." This shows that if we use 444 B.C.E. as a starting date the alleged second "anointed one" was "cut off" in the period following the year 38 C.E. (that is, "after the sixty-two weeks"). There would be no connection to anyone "cut off" prior to that year. Thus, there is no reference here to Jesus.

Question: How can Christians apply the phrase v'ayn lo, "he has nothing" or "he shall have nothing" (Daniel 9:26) and Isaiah 53:12, where the suffering servant receives "a portion with the great," to Jesus?

Answer: One needs to understand that both references, when read in the context of Christian theology, refer to Jesus after his death and supposed resurrection: Daniel 9:26 referring to after he is "cut off" and Isaiah 53:12 as a reward for his suffering and death.

Yet, v'ayn lo, "he has nothing" or "he shall have nothing" cannot refer to Jesus' situation at or after death, if one takes the New Testament seriously. Christianity claims that unlike mere mortal bodies which decay after death Jesus rose bodily into heaven, where he sits at the "right hand of the throne of the Majesty."

V'ayn lo certainly could not refer to a lack of wealth or followers, for this would not distinguish Jesus from the great majority of the world's population. One who "has nothing" or "shall have nothing" (Daniel 9:26) does not receive "a portion with the great" (Isaiah 53:12), does not rise bodily to heaven (Acts 1:9), and does not sit at the "right hand of the throne of the Majesty" (Hebrews 8:1). It is precisely with his death that Jesus was allegedly able to attain his rewards (Philippians 2: 8-9). Therefore, the application of both verses to Jesus is untenable.

Question: Why do Jews say that the Seventy Weeks countdown begins with the Persian king Cyrus?

Answer: It is Isaiah who proclaims that Cyrus would give the actual command to rebuild Jerusalem. God declares through the prophet, "He [Cyrus] shall build My city" (Isaiah 45:13; see also Ezra 1:1-8, 6:1-5). Indeed, it was Cyrus who issued a proclamation (ca. 537 B.C.E.) for the return, and for the rebuilding to start. This occurred forty-nine years after the destruction of Jerusalem. God declares concerning Cyrus, "He is My shepherd, and shall perform all My pleasures; even saying of Jerusalem: 'She shall be built'; and to the Temple: 'Your foundation shall be laid'" (Isaiah 44:28). Hence, the Scriptures teach that it was during the reign of Cyrus that the rebuilding of the city began. This was symbolized, first of all, by the start of construction on the Second Temple, which was completed ca. 516 B.C.E., seventy years after the destruction. It is with the completion of the Temple that the period of desolation officially terminates.

Isaiah 45:1 describes Cyrus as God's "anointed." His decree to rebuild Jerusalem comes forty-nine years after the destruction of the city and the Temple, which is the time when an "anointed one" (Daniel 9:25) is to come to fulfill the prophecy, ". . . until an anointed one, a prince, shall be seven weeks [forty-nine years]."

When all is said and done, the biblical record must speak for itself. That record shows that it was Cyrus (Isaiah 45:13), who is given credit by God for the rebuilding of Jerusalem. As we have seen, the initial effort to rebuild was a direct result of Cyrus' decree. All subsequent permits were based on this decree.

Question: If Cyrus is the "anointed one" mentioned in Daniel 9:25 who is the "anointed one" mentioned in Daniel 9:26?

Answer: The first seven weeks ends in 537 B.C.E. The second segment of the Seventy Weeks period, sixty-two weeks in length, covered by verse 26, culminates in 103 B.C.E. (586-49-434=103 B.C.E.). Verse 26 indicates that "after sixty-two weeks an anointed one shall be cut off." This "anointed one" is the High Priest Alexander Yannai (103-76 B.C.E.) who came to power just at the end of the sixty-two week period in 103 B.C.E. and was the last of the important Hasmonean leaders. The phrase "after sixty-two weeks" indicates the time frame during which the "anointed one shall be cut off," that is, suffer karet, "excision." The penalty accompanying karet is here aptly described as "to have nothing," or "be no more." This punishment is given to Alexander Yannai infamous for his unjust, tyrannical, and bloody rule. He is notorious for his open violent animosity against the Pharisees and his brazen rejection of the Oral Law. For example, Josephus records that Alexander Yannai fought against the Pharisees for six years, "and . . . slew no fewer than fifty thousand of them" (Jewish Antiquities XIII. 13. 5. [373]). He also "ordered some eight hundred of the Jews to be crucified, and slaughtered their children and wives before the eyes of the still living wretches" (Jewish Antiquities XIII. 14. 2. [380]).

Verse 26 shows when Alexander Yannai, the "anointed one," would assume power and what kind of punishment would be meted out to him for his transgressions against God.

Question: Is the Seventy Weeks countdown of Daniel 9 computed according to a 360-day "prophetic year"?

Answer: There is no "prophetic year" of 360 days alluded to anywhere in the Bible. It is a nineteenth century Christian invention developed through imaginative use of the Genesis flood narrative.

Some post-biblical sectarian literature and the apocryphal books of Jubilees and Enoch advocate a calendar consisting of 364 days, divided into twelve months of thirty days each. At the end of each three-month cycle a thirty-first day was added to the month. But, this is still not a 360-day "prophetic year."

Obviously, the calendar used in the Daniel 9 countdown has nothing to do with the nineteenth century development of a spurious 360-day "prophetic year."

Question: I have noticed that there are many differences between Jewish Bible translations of Daniel 9:25-26 and several different Christian Bible translations. What should be the correct readings of the disputed words and phrases?

Answer: In our study of the different translations we will compare the Hebrew text with that of the King James Version of the Bible. It contains the grossest errors, which are, in whole or in part, duplicated by other Christian versions of the Bible.

First, the King James Version puts a definite article before "Messiah the Prince" (9:25). The original Hebrew text does not read "the Messiah the Prince," but, having no article, it is to be rendered "a mashiach ["anointed one," "messiah"], a prince," i.e., Cyrus (Isaiah 45:1, 13; Ezra 1:1-2).

The word mashiach is nowhere used in the Jewish Scriptures as a proper name, but as a title of authority of a king or a high priest. Therefore, a correct rendering of the original Hebrew should be: "an anointed one, a prince."

Second, the King James Version disregards the Hebrew punctuation. The punctuation mark 'atnach functions as the main pause within a sentence. The 'atnach is the appropriate equivalent of the semicolon in the modern system of punctuation. It thus has the effect of separating the seven weeks from the sixty-two weeks: ". . . until an anointed one, a prince, shall be seven weeks; then for sixty-two weeks it shall be built again . . ." (9:25).

By creating a sixty-nine week period, which is not divided into two separate periods of seven weeks and sixty-two weeks respectively, Christians reach an incorrect conclusion, i.e., that the Messiah will come 483 years after the destruction of the First Temple.

Some Christians claim that there is something called a "prophetic year" of 360 days, thus shortening the interval between the beginning of the 483 years which they claim began in 444 B.C.E., and the date of the crucifixion of Jesus. They do this in order to make the dates coincide, but the claim of a "prophetic year" is without any scriptural foundation.

Third, the King James Version omits the definite article in Daniel 9:26, which should read: "And after the threescore and two weeks. . . ." By treating the sixty-two weeks as a distinct period, this verse, in the original Hebrew, shows that the sixty-two weeks mentioned in verse 25 are correctly separated from the seven weeks by the 'atnach. Hence, two anointed ones are spoken of in this chapter, one of whom comes after seven weeks (Cyrus), and the other after a further period of sixty-two weeks (Alexander Yannai).

Fourth, the words v'ayn lo (9:26) are incorrectly translated by the King James Version as "but not for himself." They should be translated as "he has nothing" or "he shall have nothing." There are Christian commentators who maintain this phrase has both meanings, but that claim cannot be supported grammatically.
 
Content Copyright Gerald Sigal, 1999-2003
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up