Quite the impassioned speach there. I won't say I agree with the more spiritual proclamations, and I won't say I agree that without active Christianity, the West would decend into barbarism, and I do think the anti-smoking and anti-drunk-driving things are good things. But it's a fair point. There's a lot of anti-Christian stink going around. And if Richard Dawkins really wants the government to protect children from their parent's beliefs, I think I'm starting to hate him. What about atheism? Can we protect them from their atheist parents, too? If not, then the man can take his suggestion and shove it where the sun don't shine, as far as I'm concerned.